 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) I promised myself I wouldn't continue fanning the flames here, but I couldn't resist one more... The gist of the complaints against TLC I'm hearing is they've made a business decision that "changed" from an earlier "promise" (neither of which (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) Gary, the problem is that from Jake's mouth: Quote: I do know, however, that there will be 5 set limit per customer on this set (Troy,are you listening? J). Why you ask? This set uses …drum roll please… Maersk blue! In fact, the run of this (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) MAJOR SNIPAGE (...) The problem doesn't lie within the community it lies within the company. Proof of this is that they are dumbfounded as to why with all of their efforts they are still loosing money. I missed The whole Marsk debate but let's (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) For your amusement: (URL) #203 (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) To clarify: "collectibility", by your explanations, is based purely on your own *speculation* (and others who share your thinking). TLC's "assertion" (as you call it) had nothing whatsoever to do with making the set "collectible", since, as (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) [snip] (...) John, I really don't understand this point. I mean that literally, I don't understand. You may very well be right within this odd-sounding (to me) corner of the collector world. But personally, I fail to see how a simple set (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) All this attitude does is tell Lego that when they make a cool set for a corporate client, they are better off not offering it to the general public. Luckily for the sane amongst us, the public in general doesn't have this attitude. So the (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) Amen, And thank you William, Another voice of reason. Let the collectors cry all they want. As I said, Kudos to TLC for taking Mearsk's money and making a profit. Oh, the collectors don't want that happening. WELL TO DAMN BAD. Steven Weiser (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: One last Spring Cleaning set
|
| (...) Is that what you get when you cross Tuesday and Thursday? (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.market.shopping)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| In lugnet.lego, Johannes Koehler wrote: ... While on the other (...) I applaud any effort by TLC to spoil the efforts of speculators to profit from the scarcity of a set. I wish they would rerelease monorail, Classic Space, and a bunch of other (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
|
