 | | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) Yes I can decisively say that. I think I did already, actually. (...) That kind of information would be covered under the NDA so I can't specifically comment. (...) After dinner the lot of us fested till pretty late, so at 2 AM when (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) Exxx...xxxcellent. (...) So you know then? (...) MOCs at din? --Todd (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: More Venom Anyone? ( Was Re: Give them a break (was:Hey, like, is anyone there? ))
|
|
You know, I've stayed out of this debate for a long time now, though, I can't stand this anymore.. Granted, I've bought some (all) Throwbots, they were interesting when they first came out... a couple Roboriders, (got as b-day presents). Though I'm (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) My apologies everyone, I totally underestimated the power of the (LEGO)Force. I'm very glad that Trains have a bright future, this has been my lesson in faith. -Harvey (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) Awesome! I hope all of those who have been whining will think about what happened here, and think about Larry's comments over the past few months about how whining is not the best way to go about things, and consider that this meeting probably (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Use of lugnet.lego.direct and lugnet.dear-lego
|
|
I'd like to make a suggestion on the use of lugnet.lego.direct and lugnet.dear-lego. Of late there has been much "debate" about whether TLC is doing "the right thing" or not, or somewhere in between. While some very legitimate concerns are getting (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) That kind of information would be covered under the NDA so I can't specifically comment. (...) After, last nite back at the hotel, and most all day during the meeting. Train MOCs have a way of taking up the entire table, which is not prudent. (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) Ahh, in other words: "Splunge." :-) (...) a total blast! Glad to hear it was fun and productive!! --Todd [followups to .trains] (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: lego software
|
|
in article G87I4K.1t3@lugnet.com, Tim Courtney at tim@zacktron.com wrote on 2/3/2001 6:21 PM: (...) GOT to be a joke...although a pretty elaborate one. If it isn't a joke, then one of LEGO's contract programmers is in for big trouble for doing this, (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) Thanks :^) ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
