 | | Re: Hey, like, is anyone there? (was: When is Mac support coming for LEGO Mosaic?)
|
|
(...) Tom, I don't think this is a lousy idea--in fact I we have suggested it to Brad as one possibility. (Brad, by the way, does still work at LEGO Direct, Todd.) As David Eaton said in the next thread-branch over ((URL) we need to figure out what (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Give them a break (was:Hey, like, is anyone there? )
|
|
(...) I think this post by Tomas Clark: (URL) that and I think you're going to see more effort to set the right expectations with us so we don't expect more than can be delivered. I met Tomas Clark today, and he was happy, but very very tired, (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Hey, like, is anyone there? (was: When is Mac support coming for LEGO Mosaic?)
|
|
Tomas Clark wrote: Snipped post by lego direct. (...) This is exactly the sort of post we want. Just a regular update as to whats happening at lego. (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Hey, like, is anyone there? (was: When is Mac support coming for LEGO Mosaic?)
|
|
(...) Yup. Lar's post was good too. We do need to lighten up here on LUGNET. From what I know LEGO is working hard to keep communicating with us. There's frustration on both sides, we need to work on communicating and being positive and constructive (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: The Quality Downfall
|
|
(...) For starters, the whole thing was too short and WAY too polite. C'mon, spew some venom, Man! I am of two minds on the issue of whether I care or not. On the one hand, TLC continues to make pathetically stupid choices about their product line (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | More Venom Anyone? ( Was Re: Give them a break (was:Hey, like, is anyone there? ))
|
|
(...) Is there some unknown reason why any of the rest of us should adopt this ***-kissing attitude towards TLC? Some of you are just the most appalling TLC apologists... ...pucker up, Lar! I am personally impressed to see Todd show some real (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: The Quality Downfall
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:G86DAE.3uH@lugnet.com... (...) Spewing venom will not get anyone anywhere. The only thing it will serve to do is create emnity between the two groups here - the AFOLs and LEGO Direct, (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Direct Sales Venom
|
|
I probably shouldn’t be answering a troll post, but I post infrequency enough anyway. I find it hard to believe I’m siding with Larry again. Having worked for Lego in what seems like a long ago life, I can understand your frustrations about the time (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: More Venom Anyone? ( Was Re: Give them a break (was:Hey, like, is anyone there? ))
|
|
(...) Yeah, actually. I think you might find it called "We actually want to have a good relationship with a major company that really doesn't HAVE to listen to us or give input, but does anyway, albeit in a slow and strange manner." (...) Yes. You (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Let's be realistc (WasRe:MoreVenomAnyone? (WasRe:Givethemabreak (was:Hey,like,isanyonethere?)))
|
|
(...) I have wondered about this also. (...) So you worry about negative posts here damaging a good relationship with TLC? Please don't. The LEGO Company does have to listen due to the fact that their bulk sales will get a real shot in the arm from (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
