 | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Don Heyse
|
| | | (...) Ouch! That hurts. Did you bump your head or something? (...) I think you're missing the point. With an LDR file I can move the arms and legs of a Mech to see what it looks like in different poses. I can spin the gears of a robot even if I (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | (...) Actually Don, I agree with all those points and am in favor of authors having the option to post their DAT/LDR/MPD files along with the images. My point is that within the scope of a completed model, having a contest on how the model is (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) I got the point, but I'm not completely convinced. Anyhow, I really only suggested the LDRotM contest because I'm afraid the model sellers might be influential enough to eliminate even the *option* of publishing the LDR files in the MotM (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) irrelevent. (...) Kevin (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
