 | | Re: Saw the movie today! (bit OT)
|
|
(...) Speaking as an outsider, since I haven't read more than a few pages of Potter (though I'm casually familiar with the overall plot), I would suggest that one of Rowlings' greatest virtues is that the vast story she's crafted is one of very, (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Saw the movie today! (bit OT)
|
|
(...) Show me any book that is totally original. As a childrens book, which as you point out it is, I have to say that the series is building up to be an impressive set of books with the prisoner of Azkaban being my favourite so far. Yes of course, (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Saw the movie today! (bit OT)
|
|
(...) to (...) Never mind the film itself, what about the SW part 2 trailer? That was worse. SW has clearly drifted into the mainstream Hollywood bracket, with all those earth-bound shots of scenic beauty and lovey-dovey romantic diversions. Pah! (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Saw the movie today! (bit OT)
|
|
(...) oo-er :) (...) yes the very same. It was over a character from the book of death, but he's not going to sue now (I checked) whoo hoo 15 days till Fellowship of the Ring -- James Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 - I'm a citizen of (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Saw the movie today! (bit OT)
|
|
"James Stacey" <james@minifig.co.uk> wrote in message news:GntA1M.2HD@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) <snip> The same Neil gaiman of "Sandman" fame? Why's he suing? I for one will not be seeing the Harry Potter movie or reading the books. Why (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
