 | | Re: new set connectability?
|
|
Hey Ken, I can't seem to get home before it gets dark to take good pictures. (Grrr...winter coming...) I hope to post some on Saturday morning. (23 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: new set connectability?
|
|
In lugnet.harrypotter, Drew Dirschell writes: snip (...) snip I don't suppose you have any pictures available ? they sound quite interesting and I'm always interested in other people's idea's. Ken (23 years ago, 28-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: new set connectability?
|
|
Bill Wrote: (...) I don't think we're expecting total realism, or even brick realism. The modules are a great way to rearrange and rebuild your castle on a non-brick by brick level. I was delighted to see TLC present the castle in the form of (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: new set connectability?
|
|
(...) Some sets that's true (most of 4730), others its not. For example, if you take off the green roof bits of 4735 slytherin, it's not nearly as tall as the module needs to be to work with the other modules, which are all thirteen bricks tall (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: new set connectability?
|
|
(...) Not if it was situated in a part of the castle that is only two floors high. I think expecting total realism from a LEGO(R) toy building set is not realistic. Build your own Hogwarts(R) castle, with your own Harry Potter(R) and Hermione (...) (23 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
