 | | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!) —Mike Stanley
| | | | (...) Ok, so you see I wasn't necessarily (or at all, in fact) responding to the alleged "skimpiness" of the new sets. Cool. Give me basic gray bricks, castle walls, and pitchforks and I'll be happy. I'd agree with anyone who felt that FK, DF, and (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!) —Todd Lehman
| | | | | | (...) Well, see, that's your opinion, and that's fine. But when other opinions differ, that doesn't make someone a doofus, right? Whenever I find myself going "oh gawd" about anyone who's excited by UFO, Exploriens, or Insectoids, I remind myself (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!) —Jeff Johnston
| | | | | (...) Hey...Ninja brought me out of my Dark Ages. It's got some great sets, it's better looking (and better value) than Fright Knights...heck, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it's better than FK, RK, Dragon Masters, and possibly even Dark (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | |
