 | | Re: Castle returns for 2000!
|
|
(...) Whoa, whoa, whoa. Are you trying to say that what Mike's wife said (in the quotes above, for those of you following at home) unfairly implies that women with small breasts can't be whores, or are you trying to say that the statement is (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle returns for 2000!
|
|
Lorbaat wrote in message ... (...) women (...) statement (...) I meant the latter, but this argument is heading way off topic... Eric (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle returns for 2000!
|
|
(...) I know for SURE that can't be the case... and please don't ask me why. (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle returns for 2000!
|
|
(...) Exactly. A logical fallacy! You saw my point. Now, about this evidence you have- I think you should share with everyone so we can have a proof for our theory. Please, elucidate us! eric (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle returns for 2000!
|
|
(...) That's why I moved it to off-topic.fun. Cheesy joke about why .fun over .debate snipped for everyone's sanity. eric (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle returns for 2000!
|
|
(...) I can back Larry up on this one. I have no idea what evidence he has, I've got my own. (...) That goes double for me. Steve (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
