 | | Re: stupid question —Mike Stanley
|
| | | (...) Wow, that's violating one of the core rules of behaviour for discussion groups. Here's what it sounds like to us: Hey, I can't figure this out, so I want one of you people to help me. Oh, but don't post it here, because my time is too valuable (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: stupid question —Chris Phillips
|
| | | | | (...) Especially since he's asking how to post a new thread here that he apparently doesn't intend to follow...? (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | How to Post (was: "stupid question") —Chris Phillips
|
| | | | | | | (...) To be fair, the original question should be answered here for the record. You must "drill down" to a specific newsgroup in order to post. (Choose from the list of links at the top of the page.) Once you are down in the hierarchy at least one (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: stupid question —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) ...and even more so because he's actually posting a new thread to ask how to post a new thread, rather silly when you stop to think about it. D'oh! LFB. (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: stupid question —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) My bad, I just saw all the "reference" headers. Feh. Here's one more! (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: stupid question —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Mike Stanley (<slrn81t0pg.s4.cjc@....utk.edu>) wrote at 05:08:34 (...) Not to me. I rather thought there were many groups here on Lugnet so that people could tune in to their specific interest. Jon has tried to make an on topic (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
| | | | |
