 | | Re: Sig —Todd Lehman
| | | | (...) It's something that's definitely more -possible- in that scenario... But not being a big fan of sigs (because of bandwidth and indexing), I can't say I'm exactly chomping at the bit to write that particular hunk of code... :) --Todd (26 years ago, 18-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Sig —Jeff Thompson
| | | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message <36527a51.27590202@l...et.com>... (...) say (...) :) (...) Speaking of indexing -- If I listed set 6077 as your favorite castle set in my lego code sig, then it's going to make it a lot harder to search for posts that (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Sig —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) One thing, though: As long as you use the standard sig format, it's "safe" to put that in -- sigs gets stripped by the indexer, so it wouldn't actually mess up article indexing on the server... --Todd (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Sig —Jeff Thompson
| | | | | (...) Oh, cool! So, what indicates the beginning of a sig? Are my two dashes a sufficient signifier? -- jthompson@esker.com (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
