Subject:
|
Re: Sig
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Nov 1999 17:48:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
705 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message <36527a51.27590202@lugnet.com>...
>
> It's something that's definitely more -possible- in that scenario... But
> not being a big fan of sigs (because of bandwidth and indexing), I can't • say
> I'm exactly chomping at the bit to write that particular hunk of code... • :)
>
> --Todd
Speaking of indexing --
If I listed set 6077 as your favorite castle set in my lego code sig, then
it's
going to make it a lot harder to search for posts that specifically
reference
that set.
I was thinking of dusting off my lego code, but this gives me
pause.
--
jthompson@esker.com
"Floating down the sound resounds around the icy waters underground"
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Sig
|
| (...) One thing, though: As long as you use the standard sig format, it's "safe" to put that in -- sigs gets stripped by the indexer, so it wouldn't actually mess up article indexing on the server... --Todd (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Sig
|
| (...) It's something that's definitely more -possible- in that scenario... But not being a big fan of sigs (because of bandwidth and indexing), I can't say I'm exactly chomping at the bit to write that particular hunk of code... :) --Todd (26 years ago, 18-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
