Subject:
|
Re: Sig
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Nov 1999 23:33:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
647 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jeff Thompson writes:
> Todd Lehman wrote in message <36527a51.27590202@lugnet.com>...
> > It's something that's definitely more -possible- in that scenario... But
> > not being a big fan of sigs (because of bandwidth and indexing), I can't
> > say I'm exactly chomping at the bit to write that particular hunk of
> > code...
>
> Speaking of indexing --
>
> If I listed set 6077 as your favorite castle set in my lego code sig, then
> it's going to make it a lot harder to search for posts that specifically
> reference that set.
>
> I was thinking of dusting off my lego code, but this gives me pause.
One thing, though: As long as you use the standard sig format, it's "safe"
to put that in -- sigs gets stripped by the indexer, so it wouldn't actually
mess up article indexing on the server...
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Sig
|
| (...) Oh, cool! So, what indicates the beginning of a sig? Are my two dashes a sufficient signifier? -- jthompson@esker.com (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Sig
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message <36527a51.27590202@l...et.com>... (...) say (...) :) (...) Speaking of indexing -- If I listed set 6077 as your favorite castle set in my lego code sig, then it's going to make it a lot harder to search for posts that (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
