| |
In lugnet.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.trains, "Robert Munafo" <munafo@gcctechNO.SPAMcom> writes:
> > [...]
> > I'm also sending this to the trains group because I'm wondering why they • don't
> > use any Ritvik parts in their layouts. A three-foot-high green and gray
> > mountain looks the same no matter whose logo is micro-molded onto the studs.
>
> Eeek! Byetch!!!! Ritvik is not LEGO!
>
> (That's why. :)
>
> --Todd
Silly me. I'll just go back to my robots now (-:
In case anyone wants to defend Ritvik (not likely 8-) I'll set followup-to the
infid^H^H^H^H^Hclone-brands discussion group
- Robert Munafo
LEGO: TC+++(8480) SW++ #+ S-- LS++ Hsp M+ A@ LM++ YB64m IC13
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Bulk Ordering - Secrets Revealed.
|
| I'd use Ritvik in underpinnings if it was strong enough(1). GMLTC modules are on carriers, but ultimately are held together by the adhesive force of the studs in them. Any minor variations in that mean you have stress fracture fault line potentials. (...) (25 years ago, 6-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
Message is in Reply To:
155 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
