Subject:
|
Re: Bulk Ordering - Secrets Revealed.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Aug 1999 14:28:17 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.%Spamcake%com
|
Viewed:
|
1749 times
|
| |
|
|
I'd use Ritvik in underpinnings if it was strong enough(1). GMLTC
modules are on carriers, but ultimately are held together by the
adhesive force of the studs in them. Any minor variations in that mean
you have stress fracture fault line potentials. Any major variations and
the modules will not survive the jouncing they get in the trailer.
1 - especially if it sent a message to TLG... Can you see a banner on
the wall behind a GMLTC show "We love LEGO. Bulk bricks provided by
Ritvik because they're willing to work with us" making it into a
newspaper?
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bulk Ordering - Secrets Revealed.
|
| (...) don't (...) Silly me. I'll just go back to my robots now (-: In case anyone wants to defend Ritvik (not likely 8-) I'll set followup-to the infid^H^H^H^H^Hclone-brands discussion group - Robert Munafo LEGO: TC+++(8480) SW++ #+ S-- LS++ Hsp M+ (...) (25 years ago, 6-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
155 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
