 | | Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
|
| Yikes! Thanks, Todd, for pointing me to this thread. I admit I haven't been keeping up with lugnet lately. That is indeed my APC model on the LEGO website. However, after reading the rules I wonder if LEGO will do anything. Here's an excerpt: "The (...) (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
|
| (...) [snip] (...) Given the context, I think "misdirected" means it's not TLG's fault if some kid puts the wrong address on their envelope. (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
|
| (...) So, does this mean that your model now belongs to them? Oh, and they won't give it back. :) Mostly kidding, Ben Roller P.S. I tend to agree that misdirected entry means something near "lost in the mail", but who knows. (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
|
| In lugnet.general, Greg Williams writes: you could call Lego Shop @ home and ask to speak to somone in consumer affiars( I think this is the correct name) I was told about this while placing an order. I had asked the question as to why the service (...) (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
|
| (...) Or that the Postal Service delivers it to the wrong address I would think. Ben Gatrelle (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
