 | | Re: Lego mentioned on Slashdot —Steve Bliss
| | | | (...) Nothing (well, very little, and that's not even mentioned, just something we're aware of) to do with the (im)proper use of of the LEGO trademark. Steve (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego mentioned on Slashdot —Mike Stanley
| | | | | (...) Well, after reading the part that DID inspire the post (the few geeks debating the trademark) I decided to go back and grab the url for the entire thread, thinking some people might not be familiar with Slashdot and not be able to find the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego mentioned on Slashdot —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) My apologies. That scrolling-down thingy gets me everytime. (note to Todd: LUGNET's interface is much better than slashdot's) (...) No, I'm glad you posted it. I just missed the 'lego vs legos' part of what you pointed to. Steve (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
