|
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
| (...) I typically post only when the urge comes upon me. I've gotten around this whole issue by posting my pictures to a site that counts the number of hits. If people like what they see, I'll see the hits. That's enough for me. -Duane (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | Re: Nothing to say?
|
| Thanks for bringing this up. I have been posting about some MOCs I built this this year and getting occasional responses but sometimes none at all, and I figured either people just didn't think they were that amazing or something. IMO my best recent (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | Re: Nothing to say?
|
| (...) --snip-- (...) Hi Jojo, I think you should. What is easy to forget for those who've been around for a while is that the entry-level is now so much lower than the best. The top quality of MOCs has increased so fast that it is almost impossible (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
| | | | Re: Nothing to say?
|
| Hello! So I have read all the replies in this thread and decided I'd spotlight that post. (And did so.) That made me think: >Hm, every once in a while I see posts with MOCs and no answers but with like five spotlights. It's nice people like that (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
| | | | Re: Nothing to say?
|
| In lugnet.general, Timothy Gould wrote: SNIP (...) Rant or otherwise, you are correct, Tim. Too many members/viewers/lurkers do not post any comments here on new MOC announcements. A part of that may be the LUGNET interface, but perhaps more so is a (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| |