 | | Lego Hobby Blues —Thomas Main
|
| | | The thrill is gone. There's so much about our hobby that has changed over the last few years and a lot of it has changed for the worse. LUGNET This used to be THE place that the online community got together and talked about the hobby. Now, it has a (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Anthony Sava
|
| | | | | (...) <SNIP> (...) A lot of people have been complaining about Classic-Castle, Classic-Space and all the other websites 'responsible for the fractioning of Lugnet.' So here are some points that you and others may have not thought about: New Blood: (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Anthony Sava
|
| | | | | | (...) Whoops... looking back, change that to 2 years, 3 months. --Anthony (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | Hi Thomas, --SNIP-- I'm not going to comment on the first section as I am not sure myself what I prefer there. (...) AFOLs are people and people like to gossip. The Swanberg case is just spomething to gossip about really, much like the Michael (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | | Hello Thomas, Your posting caught my eye today as you're obviously unhappy with the way you see things. At the bottom of your message you say: (...) I'm hoping to provide some discussion. As to whether or not that also constitutes "insight" is up to (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Bruce Hietbrink
|
| | | | | Hey Thomas, A good and thoughtful post, but I have to disagree with some of the points. Swanberg - Yes, there is the Michael Jackson factor and we all like to gossip, but I do think there were some relevant questions that did impact the community: (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Thomas Main
|
| | | | | | (...) These are good and valid points. The kind of thing that I totally understand being thought about and discussed. But there seemed an almost "stone him" kind of mean-spiritedness about what I saw online too. (...) I do this kind of thing too!! (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) (snipped a lot of interesting stuff) (...) Look into LENNI.. while it does not allow you to post from a single interface, the aggregation it gives you at least gives you a single view of the many communities that choose to make their content (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) My bad, working from memory. The acronym is now ILENN. Here's the (URL) announcement> (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) And a newer announcement (URL) here>. ROSCO (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | | (...) Yeah, it seems Lugnet's kinda dead. I've noticed this for a while. (...) Well, I don't think they detract from the community, if that's your concern. Ambassadors help spread the news, help take in ideas to Lego and that's not a bad thing. (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Tony Alexander
|
| | | | | Thomas, Good Afternoon! Things aren't all bad...it sounds to me as if you're sorely needing a building break. So do I! But don't let that fool you into thinking things are worse overall; really, this is a matter of perspective. (...) One thing about (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Bob Parker
|
| | | | | (...) Yes, I would concur with this. But I don't see it as being all bad. IMHO, the more choices the better for everyone. Some forums Murrfle at the drop of a hat...some seem Elitist...others are full of drivel. Take for instance JLUG - it is not (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | (...) I'd say some of the fun in gone, but maybe it is just out of our reach and it is up to us to make the most of it. I personnaly have so many driving and creative juices I could be occupied for the next umpteen years. Does the community hold the (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Soren Roberts
|
| | | | | | Cheer up, emo kid. There's no reason you should be hinging all that on whether or not you got responses for a given MOC. If number of responses is the only way you measure your model's worth, maybe you should try harder to be impressive. Also, (...) (19 years ago, 11-Dec-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.general, Soren Roberts wrote: Whateva... (19 years ago, 11-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —David Simmons
|
| | | | | (...) Then take a break. I know I have, many times. I haven't updated my website in almost a year. I've got about five completed projects that I would love to photograph and display, but I'm too busy trying to find a new career. Lego as a hobby is (...) (19 years ago, 8-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Mark Stafford
|
| | | | | (...) <snip Legofan paragraph> (...) I think your concern over your Lego hobby is a bit hard on yourself. Those of us in the 'developed world' often spend more on a burger then some families in less fortunate parts have to feed a family for a week. (...) (19 years ago, 9-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Dan Thompson
|
| | | | | In lugnet.general, Thomas Main wrote a lot (...) I will keep it short as I can as some of these are long. Swanberg is an issue because no one has done what he has or at least hasn't been caught doing it. It's a big deal because it reflects poorly on (...) (19 years ago, 9-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Patrick S. O'Donnell
|
| | | | | (...) I look at my spending as a pack and a half of cigarettes a day! Face it, if you're working, paying taxes, you deserve something for yourself. I don't believe we're all here to just scrape by. Like the Rush song - ROLL THE BONES! "Why are we (...) (19 years ago, 10-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | Thank you for the nice personal email. I'd just like to say; you were right. Look at what just happend. I'll keep in mind what you said regarding that. e (19 years ago, 11-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego Hobby Blues —Jeff Szklennik
|
| | | | (...) I dunno, I think it can seem that way sometimes, but it helps me to remember all the cool sets/themes that have come out in the last few years (Star Wars, Legends, Designer series, Vikings, expanded parts packs & factory, just to name a few). (...) (19 years ago, 11-Dec-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
