To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 51727 (-20)
  Re: LEGOFan.org frustrates me
 
In lugnet.general, Christopher Masi wrote: (snip) (...) It took me a week to figure what was wrong, so I feel your pain! (...) bad line break there - if you send a note to the brickjournal address, give it a title in the subject line. (...) The (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGOFan.org frustrates me
 
(...) Super, thanks Joe. The fora do seem to behave better with FireFox than with Safari :) (...) Well, I don't need to bother anyone now, since you just solved my problem :) but I'll store this e-mail address away for safe keeping. (...) Huh? (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGOFan.org frustrates me
 
(...) Ah, I was mostly expecting to see Mark or Jake responding. Somehow I missed that Ronny was with LEGO (...) The only question I currently have is over at LEGOfan, and Jake said that he is looking into it. It just seemed very quiet over there. (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: was New Ship: Harlequin --->Mantra
 
(...) (URL) Hmmm...> Perhaps some guidence and conduct agreements, or general consenus between fans could be developed. Unlike nowadays, where there is a sad lack of honor between fans. Yet this is like yesterday, now and tomorrow, our greatest (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
 
  Re: 1972 European Basic Set That May Not Exist?
 
(...) Yah, they're working again. I had to kick a process that stopped responding. I'll have to figure out why it's doing that though. (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGOFan.org frustrates me
 
(...) Ashley, While I agree for the most part you can't say "then rebuilding a few parts always does." There is one exception. (URL) using this part to make a roof it is impossible to tie the part into a slope at a 45 degree angle the way it is (...) (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGOFan.org frustrates me
 
(...) Both Ronny and Mark are aware of the posts, however, it should be noted that they are still involved in the launch of LDD, not only to this community, but to the public at large. I know that they both are busy presenting LDD in various places, (...) (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGOFan.org frustrates me
 
Christopher, I noted that Ronny Scherer of the LEGO Company has been responding to posts within the LDD forums at LEGOFan.org. What specific questions do you have? If it's about parts not snapping into the right places within LDD, I suggest removing (...) (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: 1972 European Basic Set That May Not Exist?
 
In lugnet.general, Gerhard R. Istok wrote: OK, The Peeron scans listed here were working while I was assembling this post... then they stopped working.... hopefully this will get resolved soon! Gary Istok (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  1972 European Basic Set That May Not Exist?
 
OK, I have been scratching my head on this one for a while as I am working on completing the History of Lego CD... From 1965-72 the following basic sets were produced in continental Europe, Britain and Australia (not USA/Canada). This table is from (...) (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  LEGOFan.org frustrates me
 
LEGOFan.org frustrates me for three reasons. 1. LEGOFan.org is supposed to be the place were people from LEGO answer our questions about LDD (I'd even accept "Sorry, but I can't comment on that right now), but people from LEGO aren't answering or (...) (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)  
 
  Re: LDD "hackers" made CNET
 
(...) Excellent question. We did get 2 rounds of answers but they weren't very "meaty". (...) I think as the article said, LEGO are constrained as to what they can say officially/publicly. But unofficially we're getting lots of winks, nods, thumbs (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
 
  Re: LDD "hackers" made CNET
 
(...) Why isn't TLG giving this sort of feedback though the (URL) forum> it set up specifically for that? LEGO Factory has been out for three weeks, and the TLG reps have yet to provide any answers (other than "LDD will be improved in the future"). (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
 
  LDD "hackers" made CNET
 
(URL) For those of you following the efforts of LDD users in streamlining the bag use in LDD, CNET published a cool article about it, and LEGO's reaction to their work. Quoted are Dan Malec, Larry Pieniazek, and Jake McKee (among others). I find it (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)  
 
  Escher preview (Re: Gold (Re: My collection of colours))
 
(...) Yeah, it's a pain in the neck to photograph--especially the leftmost pillar. But here's another shot, I think it's the best I'll get: (URL) here's a larger size image: (URL) background on this project, I'm building a series of Escher models (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build)  
 
  Re: What Lego sets use Jigs
 
(...) Ya, I was thinking about my definition was too restrictive. I'm curious about the use of Jigs in sets in general. If the pieces used to make the jig are reused in some other way in the set I'd still consider it a jig worth hearing about. It's (...) (19 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: What Lego sets use Jigs
 
(...) Wow, that's the most complex Jig I've seen so far. I was expecting most would be single pieces holding something in place. That's cool. I assume some of those pieces are reused in the final model. Derek (19 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: What Lego sets use Jigs
 
(...) 8062 does the same thing, to align the front and rear wheel sets. (19 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: What Lego sets use Jigs
 
(...) I think the 8421 crane does. There are some beams you put on the steering (to keep it straight) but take them off before you're done. Steve (19 years ago, 13-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: What Lego sets use Jigs
 
(...) The new crane had a studless beam construction to make sure the axles are aligned properly for the steering setups. I can't remember if those studless beams were then used in the structure of the crane afterwards--can't remember if I had any (...) (19 years ago, 13-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR