 | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets —Duane Hess
|
| | | I'll second the stubby look. The fuselage looks a little short. As for lumpy, what do you expect? LEGOs traditionally have lumpy studs on top. :-) Duane (...) (26 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | [followups set to lugnet.starwars] (...) That is a GREAT shot! It's funny, though, that they chose a shot of an X-Wing in closed-wing configuration -- it's not even an "X" in that shot. :) (...) Well hey, the neat thing is that the fuselage can be (...) (26 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) It was the best one I could find in 10 seconds. :) (...) True. Like I said, I suppose I was expecting too much. I'll probably appreciate them more when I see them in person. (26 years ago, 4-Nov-98, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets —Jesse Long
|
| | | | | Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) LeoCAD (...) least (...) I want to know why the hinge piece along the side (for the engine cover or whatever) isn't orange to match the rest of the trim. Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist Looking for (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-98, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Oh, sorry, when I said "it's funny that they" I meant the people at Lucas... I assumed the URL above was some sort of glossary definition at the official SW site. So there are other X-Wing photos up there I suppose, huh? :) I'll go have a (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-98, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
