To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 50978
50977  |  50979
Subject: 
Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Sun, 5 Jun 2005 23:28:31 GMT
Viewed: 
810 times
  
In lugnet.general, Felix Greco wrote:
   So now, as an adult, my sense of aesthetics and taste are a bizarre mish-mash of all these things. I like bright vivid colors, surreal situations, and all that is gitchy.

Unbeknownst to me, this had all been worked out, discussed, and labeled by others. They call it Lowbrow art, also known as Pop Surrealism. The movers and shakers of the movement are folks like Todd White and Shag. This is the artwork that is appealing to me. I find I identify with it. It may be the voice of my generation. I think others feel the same way, but have just not bothered to put a label on it. Folks like Lenny Hoffman and Nelson just to name a couple (related: Kevin & Tim’s Bot Contest is sure to produce more off-beat weirdness).

Wow. What a great post (I mainly say this because you linked to Mr.Ham).

Warning: Rambling About to Commense

I think a better title might have been “The Art of LEGO: A New Perspective” - that usually when we think of the ‘Art of LEGO’ - we think of mosaics and sculptures, and items that could probably make it into an art gallery at some point in time. Not that these things are bad, they aren’t. A lot of them I am very impressed with - but my point is that there is a new version of LEGO Art which is quite a bit different.

I think Pop Surrealism might be a good label for it - if for no other reason than the example of the artists that you linked to. But I think one of the key parts of this new LEGO Art is using the medium of LEGO (brightly colored children’s building blocks) to rebuild the bizarre and sometimes dark side of reality. An example of this might be at the link above. There is a picture of Mr.Ham, a robot made out of LEGO, smoking a bong. While I’m not going to say that drug use is good or bad, but it certainly isn’t the high point of our civilization. I think the picture is outrageously funny, and I think the humor comes from the odd juxtaposition. Using LEGO (a child’s toy) to make a robot (a technological wonder) who spends his time smoking (not a very galant use of time).

There isn’t any grand message there, but that is part of the point. Art doesn’t have to be about the big things in life. I think that Art shouldn’t be about the big things - by doing that, we make Art too big for our ordinary lives. And Felix made the point all too well, Art is around us all the time. Humans have a propensity to surround themselves with Art constantly, from commercials to cleverly colored cell phones. I might call this “art” (lower case a) because it isn’t trying to make any point at all, but it is still art. I think the style of the “popular” - the language of imagery that is common to the ordinary person - is the most potent ones available to an artist today.

I see a number of LEGO Artists around who do similiar sort of work. Work that draws the line between sculpture and something else - that focuses on both the ordinary and the extraordinary (Space Monkey smoking a cigar is a great example) and just touches on the humorous. A lot of what could be qualified as this ‘New LEGO Art’, most people (including the artists) would say isn’t actually Art. But I think they’d say that because it doesn’t have the quality of pretention and false depth that most people attribute to Art.

I’m really glad you wrote this post Felix because it has started me considering the artistic movement that I have suddenly found myself in the midst of. I think this is very exciting, and I’m interested in what new directions this could take.

“Me Me Me”

-Lenny



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be.
 
(...) I think an even better title would have been King Kong vs The Gilmore Girls! I was never really sure where to place minifig building amongst everything. Then I overheard Lar talking to the crowd about the train display at HoB. They kept asking (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
  Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be.
 
(...) Sure it is. If it's not a *high* point for Ham, he's using the bong incorrectly.(1) (...) Art is in the eye of the beholder. If a piece does the things that art is supposed to do (instill emotion, make one think, make one wonder) it's art. (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be.
 
What follows is a small synopsis of some the research I’ve been doing lately. I wouldn’t have otherwise written this up, but based on the good conversation that was born from the (URL) Emerge> discussion, I thought it might be fun. If you’re the (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX) ! 

13 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR