To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 50999
50998  |  51000
Subject: 
Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 18:27:10 GMT
Viewed: 
1596 times
  
In lugnet.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
   In lugnet.general, Samarth Moray wrote:
   In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:

   Art is in the eye of the beholder. If a piece does the things that art is supposed to do (instill emotion, make one think, make one wonder) it’s art.

Actually you can go further from this premise. I have interesting thoughts going through my mind while sitting in a train for example. Would you count the scenery I see passing by as art? It’s about as good as implying EVERYTHING around us is art. (1)

The original definition of Art is that it is man-made. Specifically, it seperates the world of human made objects (Art) from non-human made objects (Nature). I’d say that any definition of art has to include some manipulation by humans(1) - if even the digitial recording of nature (photographs).

I think it’s commonly accepted that good photography requires skill (composition, framing, choice of speed and exposure) and that the result can be art.

Just looking out the window at nature isn’t. However I’d say that the trestle you go across and the train you ride in are, possibly, art. Certainly Raymond Loewy thought so and the GG1 is widely regarded as a work of art (not just because it’s mechanically good, but because of how it LOOKS)

  
  
   2 - conversely this is why I’m down on 8 wide and on Miniland scale (if only in fun)... they both lift the limits that others deal with, and in a sense, are a cheat. (not that it’s wrong, if it feels good, do it...)

I’ve been increasingly interested in Miniland scale for the possibilities it opens in terms of detail. However, I’m more drawn towards the figures of Miniland, like how Felix uses them, or MisaQa’s angels. I feel that using minifigs for human figures is kinda cheating - making them out of bricks is more difficult, and therefore more “pure.”

This is, I believe, what they call “being hoist by one’s own petard”... Good one Lenny, you got me.

But I disagree anyway, the figures aren’t as important to me (at minifig scale) as what they are emplaced within.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a cool-guy wanna-be.
 
(...) The original definition of Art is that it is man-made. Specifically, it seperates the world of human made objects (Art) from non-human made objects (Nature). I'd say that any definition of art has to include some manipulation by humans(1) - if (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)

13 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR