 | | Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working?
|
|
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 12:57:28 GMT, Robert Brunskill uttered the following profundities... (...) Outlook express works fine until you have quite a few NG's on it. Then it crashes, and you lose all of the saved server info, subscribed groups, etc. All (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working?
|
|
Richard Dee <richard.dee@virgin.net> wrote in message news:MPG.11bf98d2bd3...net.com... (...) sure (...) This has not been my experience. I've been using Outlook Express for many years (since the first internal builds came out) and haven't had it (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working?
|
|
(...) I read this, and paused at the "(AFAIAA)" to figure it out. My final guess is that it means As Far As I Am Aware. But my *first* guess, and the one I like best, is; As Far As I Arrogantly Assume. :-) -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working?
|
|
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 23:19:52 GMT, Alex Wetmore uttered the following profundities... (...) I must have been unlucky, then. It happened to me twice in the space of a month. I had 2 servers, my ISP's, and Lugnet. In total maybe 100 newsgroups, of which (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working?
|
|
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 06:51:48 GMT, Terry K uttered the following profundities... (...) Thanks! :o) Your final guess is correct. Did I come across as arrogant in the gun control thread? (25 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working?
|
|
(...) Really? Cool. :-) I skim through the gun control thread, and it seems that all of it is fairly arrogant. Which makes it interesting. <g> -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
