| | Shades of Gray Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | And to give illustration to the phrase, should that be the British "grey" or the American "gray"? :-) Jake has used a somewhat perjorative rendering of the no-longer-current gray as "muddy". It carries the implication that the actual plastic is not (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.general) !
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Shades of Gray Michael Dallaston
|
| | | | (...) It's 'grey'; learn to spell, colonial scum! :P (...) Very well said. I'm not too fussed by the change, but it would be good to have a comprehensive answer to the reasoning behind it. They don't owe us that, though. From what little Jake says (...) (21 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Shades of Gray Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) Are you saying I got the color wrong? :-) (...) I'm somewhat amused at the apocolyptic visions some have placed on the color changes. I rather imagine it is reasonably close to what you outline above. Sometimes you have to do things for your (...) (21 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Shades of Gray Mark Riley
|
| | | | | (...) Hence the furor, the artists at Lego are now content while many artists in the AFOL community have had their vision shattered. Mark (21 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: Shades of Gray Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) It doesn't matter which 'color' of 'grey' you're talking about, you're still going to find someone who doesn't like the new 'gray' 'colour'. ;) But seriously.... Bruce, your post is a welcome bit of reason in all of this kafuffle. (...) This (...) (21 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |