To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 44050
44049  |  44051
Subject: 
Re: Shades of Gray
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Sat, 22 Nov 2003 03:03:19 GMT
Viewed: 
1612 times
  
In lugnet.general, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> And to give illustration to the phrase, should that be the British "grey" or the
> American "gray"? :-)
It's 'grey'; learn to spell, colonial scum! :P


> Jake has used a somewhat perjorative rendering of the no-longer-current gray as
> "muddy".  It carries the implication that the actual plastic is not up to the
> clarity that Lego is known for.  In reality, that is not the case.  In terms an
> artist or photographer would use, it is a "warm" gray.  That is, shifted to the
> "warm" end of the spectrum (yellow, orange, red), and is more specifically,
> yellow-shifted for both the light and dark gray.
> 
> Viewed in isolation, it is not a "pure", or more properly "neutral", gray.  When
> one is talking about the fairly straightforward primary colors that Lego was
> long known for, it seems in theory out of step to have a warm gray rather than a
> neutral gray, and I think that is what the Lego company and even their test
> groups are responding to.  Looking at my legions of minifig medieval troops with
> warm gray metal weapons and armor, it makes sense to have a neutral gray, or
> even a "cool" gray (blue, green, or purple are "cool" colors).
> 
> But when one is talking about buildings, roads, stones, rocks, and concrete -
> the natural world and the building blocks we make of it - then we are talking
> about warm grays.  Go out and look at your sidewalk, freeway, or asphault and it
> is probably a warm gray or black (yes, you oddballs with red asphault, I've seen
> it).  In fact, this is a color sensitivity game I play with my son, trying to
> get him to look at the road and the clouds and see all the colors that are
> there, and not simply call them "gray".
> 
> For so much of what people do with Lego, a warm gray is very appropriate.  This
> is ignoring the compatiblity problems of mixing the old and the new - I suppose
> I can actually use it to my advantage as nautural variation in the stone for
> medieval structures, but builders of more modern structures will view the mixing
> as a problem.
> 
> The point I would have to make to Lego is that they view this as an
> "improvement".  I don't think that is correct - it is merely different.  For
> some applications it is better, for some it is worse.  It would appear that they
> didn't really think through the ramifications of the change.  Perhaps I do them
> a disservice; that they did consider all the issues and felt they had to be true
> to themselves regardless.  But I still feel that they have merely made a change,
> and not an necessarily an improvement.

Very well said.  I'm not too fussed by the change, but it would be good to have
a comprehensive answer to the reasoning behind it.  They don't owe us that,
though.

From what little Jake says (and probably can say), it seems to me that consumer
feedback was a relatively small part of the decision process.  It says that Lego
themselves didn't like the colour, and were trying to unify a somewhat
disorganised palette.  Perhaps its an improvement from a design, rather than end
user perspective.  Mysterious are the ways of Lego...


Michael



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Shades of Gray
 
(...) Are you saying I got the color wrong? :-) (...) I'm somewhat amused at the apocolyptic visions some have placed on the color changes. I rather imagine it is reasonably close to what you outline above. Sometimes you have to do things for your (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Shades of Gray
 
And to give illustration to the phrase, should that be the British "grey" or the American "gray"? :-) Jake has used a somewhat perjorative rendering of the no-longer-current gray as "muddy". It carries the implication that the actual plastic is not (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.general) ! 

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR