 | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994 —Frank Filz
|
| | | (...) Google. Here's what would appear to be my first Usenet post: (URL) possible there could be an earlier post that I didn't sign my name to but still used this account. Hm poking around at a few other names, I see Lar++ used to run a BBS (and I'm (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994 —Adrian Egli
|
| | | | | "Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3ED3A29F.D6191A...ing.com... <snipped> (...) I decided to go ahead and do some goofing though google and look up some "old timers", but only on RTL. I also kept the span between Jan 1, 1996 (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994 —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | (...) too bad though. -Tim (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994 —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Heh. Here's the earliest one I could find from me: (URL) was a lack-of-anything-better handle before I felt like committing my name to public consumption. Goofy. Anyway, I'm glad to see that I've been consistent in my pro-clone views all these (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994 —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I wonder how many of us can say that clone bricks dragged us into online AFOLdom? See, my first post was about clonedom too. I beat you by 19 months, but I was talking about TENTE, so I think the obscurity/time comparators are about equal. :) (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994 —James Trobaugh
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I found this RollCall from me back in January of 1996 (URL) pretty lame looking back at it...LOL jt (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994 —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | (...) Here's me as a newcomer: (URL) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994 —Joseph Gonzalez
|
| | | | | | (...) i see the mandroid mentioned in lou's sig....that brings back lots of memories! wasn't mandroid the guy that also went by the name cerberus? i remember what a jerk he was. also found my own first/test post: (URL) for the trip down memory (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994 —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | (...) Here's my first: (URL) never saw the replies the first tim around... Here's my second, about 6 months later: (URL) Six months after the second post, I was finally reading the group regularly, so I filled in my first roll call: (URL) bet my mom (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994 —John P. Henderson
|
| | | | | | I guess it was April 1996 when I joined in by offering this little tidbit: (URL) thought my comments here were interesting (and still true): (URL) as I can tell, this was my first Roll Call post: (URL) find it curious that most of my personal (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994 —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | Interesting to dig around there. My first posting (though I'd been reading since the dying days of atl): (URL) It is especially embarassing because, as luck would have it, my first LEGO-related posts were about a clone brand. (TENTE) Yeah, yeah, (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
