 | | Re: Virus Email
|
|
(...) Indeed. Were I you, Dan, I'd drop a note to admin@lugnet.com with the url of your original post, asking that it be canceled. Todd's worked hard to make spam harvesting harder here, Dan. The people trying to point that out, and suggest that you (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Virus Email
|
|
That is becoming very common these days. I get 3 or four a day in my old yahoo account, and with a size of more then 200 kilobites, they aren't easy on the email account either. Ugg, sometimes I just want to close my ears and scream... -JHK (...) (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Virus Email
|
|
(...) Bots harvest e-mail address from posts, mailto: is not required. I (...) Posting a bunch of e-mail addresses wasn't necessary... generally speaking its bad form. Not sure what part of my response you found arrogant. (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Virus Email
|
|
(...) Take a pill. I'm not up on spam technology but I would be very surprised if clickable had much to do with it. Harvesting addresses would hardly be profitable if a person literally had to take the time to click on each one. One could imagine (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Virus Email
|
|
Even if they're not clickable, they can be harvested. They just need to be in the format of email addresses. I wouldn't be surprised if someone wrote a bot to scrape up "name at address dot com" too. But, for now that's safe. -Tim (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Virus Email
|
|
They're not clickable. That means the spammer would have to type it in. I try to warn people and I get arrogant people to post. ~Dan (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Virus Email
|
|
(...) And by posting them here they are sure to be harvested again for spam. -Rob. (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Virus Email
|
|
I've just recieved the "Microsoft Update" security patch from the sender using all the Lugnet email addresses. The exe is named q136579.exe. I'm forwarding this to his host and to Microsoft. The email addresses listed below recieved the email: (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Town without AFOL's
|
|
Hi Tobbe. "Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:HF8JM9.MCu@lugnet.com... (...) xxx...xxx *S* Not much, IMHO. Some small / medium sized Technic sets. Some Duplo and some small town / basics sets. I saw 2 buckets, one with basic (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.dk, lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.loc.no)
|
| |
| | Re: Town without AFOL's
|
|
Was there anything left? I'm curios since I'll perhaps go there on the 30th. Thanks. Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.dk, lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.loc.no)
|
| |
| | Re: Maximum Wheels + Robobots = Transformer!
|
|
(...) You're welcome. Well, Bitstream really sparked my interest about creating transformers on that scale. I do have two worked out that function like Bitstream and I have been messing with designs in my sketchbook. They will be in physical form (...) (22 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Town without AFOL's
|
|
"Hector" <hector-nospam-@danbbs.dk> wrote in message news:HF6rBI.69x@lugnet.com... (...) xxx...xxx DOH! Sorry, wrong set number, the only classic space left was 6951 (not 6991) and that went with us home ;-) /Lars "This message was transmitted on (...) (22 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.dk, lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.loc.no)
|
| |
| | Re: Town without AFOL's
|
|
Hey ;-) "Arne Lykke Nielsen" wrote in message news:HELwtK.1LB7@lugnet.com... (...) and (...) xxx...xxx Oh yes, a LOT of old toys, that´s for sure....... (...) but (...) 1984). xxx...xxx *nopes* not any more, I didn´t see any yesterday (...) (22 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.dk, lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.loc.no)
|
| |
| | Re: Direct link
|
|
Adding lugnet.mediawatch to the list of groups. This is great news David! I hope someone put's an OnLine version of your five minutes somewhere so when can all enjoy it! Kept David's messages in full below: (...) Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when (...) (22 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Direct link
|
|
Here's the direct link to my page: (URL) idea of building of a Lego house was their suggestion (the furniture would not be very comfortable, and that's not for me!). I've recently exchanged several very good e-mails with one of their representatives (...) (22 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: BBC News Item...
|
|
The only question I have regarding this story is what the heck is 'feminist metaphysics', and how is it different from the regular kind? Allister (...) (22 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Maximum Wheels + Robobots = Transformer!
|
|
(...) Hi Bas, Glad you liked it!!! I spent a lot of time in my youth playing with Transformers (though not as much as with LEGO) and I guess a little of the Transformers "feel" is buried in my brain somewhere. Thanks for the comments! Paul (22 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Helps Hospitalized Child
|
|
(...) Hi Eric- When I was 8, I spent 16 days hospitalized with pneumonia as a reaction to a ruptured appendix. LEGO was not available yet in the US and I had never heard of it. It would have been perfect! Fortunately, an uncle bought me a Tom Swift (...) (22 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Maximum Wheels + Robobots = Transformer!
|
|
Hi Andrew, (...) Thanks for the kind words. I'm glad you like it. I remember you mentioned you were interested in transformers at the last GardenSLUG meeting. (...) I think it would be awesome if a bunch of folks (in our club and/or beyond) all came (...) (22 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Maximum Wheels + Robobots = Transformer!
|
|
Sheer beauty... That's my comment. Transforming things rule! Besides that, you captured the Transformer "feeling" well. I like the robusteness of the car mode, and (unlike many transformers) the elegance of the robot. It somehow seems finished, (...) (22 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.general)
|
