 | | Change in LEGO set numbering scheme? —Mark D. McKean
| | | | [I'm posting this in .general because none of the database groups seem appropriate. Reroute FUT as appropriate.] I recently picked up one of the new Racers sets, Pro-Stunt, set #8350 (don't bother looking it up, it's not in the database yet). Now, (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Change in LEGO set numbering scheme? —Huw Millington
| | | | | "Mark D. McKean" <qpanda@quantumpanda.com> wrote in message news:H96uKx.Fv8@lugnet.com... (...) (don't (...) strikes (...) It is in _the_ database: (URL) Previously, all 8xxx sets were Technic. I think the reason for using the 8xxx series for these (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Change in LEGO set numbering scheme? —Adrian Egli
| | | | | "Huw Millington" <hmillington@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:H96vxA.KtI@lugnet.com... (...) < snipped a lot> (...) Well, we are slowly seeing the emergence of five digit numbers in the system (trains, UCS). One thought- if it's 88xx, then the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
