Subject:
|
Re: Change in LEGO set numbering scheme?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Jan 2003 15:23:57 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
Adrian Egli <adr.egli@att.SPAMCAKEnet>
|
Viewed:
|
979 times
|
| |
|
|
"Huw Millington" <hmillington@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:H96vxA.KtI@lugnet.com...
>
> "Mark D. McKean" <qpanda@quantumpanda.com> wrote in message
> news:H96uKx.Fv8@lugnet.com...
> > [I'm posting this in .general because none of the database groups seem
> > appropriate. Reroute FUT as appropriate.]
< snipped a lot>
> Given that we must be running out of 4 digit numbers, they have to use
> whatever gaps they can find, I guess.
>
> Huw
>
>
Well, we are slowly seeing the emergence of five digit numbers in the system
(trains, UCS). One thought- if it's 88xx, then the new version or reissued
set could be 888xx.
Adr.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Change in LEGO set numbering scheme?
|
| "Mark D. McKean" <qpanda@quantumpanda.com> wrote in message news:H96uKx.Fv8@lugnet.com... (...) (don't (...) strikes (...) It is in _the_ database: (URL) Previously, all 8xxx sets were Technic. I think the reason for using the 8xxx series for these (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
