Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf speed
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:15:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
587 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Kevin Loch writes:
> Our ISP (which is across the hall btw) just installed a new
> circuit and asked if we could help load test it :)
hehheh, we'll make sure to "test it" ;-)
> The good news is I now know exactly how much bandwidth brickshelf
> needs.
And what is that number exactly? I've always been curious as to how much
Brickshelf does consume.
> Besides working the business issues, I am also
> working on some code that will allow controlling the QoS for
> pages, thumbnails and full sized files independently. This would allow
> pages and thumbnails to load very quickly even if full sized files
> were slow.
If I can make a suggestion, I have found in the past that forcing the images
to be resized for display purposes even if people upload them at full res
really helps BIG time! i don't think you will find ANYONE complaining if their
1600x1200 pictures get cut in half or even down to 640 x 480 if it will
increase the speed of Brickshelf. Also, loading as much into memory would
lighten the load on "popluar" areas like say, Adrian Drakes Star Wars story.
And if you need help with any of it Kevin, please feel free to ask the
community. You have provided a fantastic service...the least we can do is help
you with whatever we can.
-alex
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brickshelf speed
|
| (...) Our ISP (which is across the hall btw) just installed a new circuit and asked if we could help load test it :) The good news is I now know exactly how much bandwidth brickshelf needs. Besides working the business issues, I am also working on (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
