 | | Re: New legend is up —David Carriker
|
| | | To me, the statements below just indicate that TLC does not have the molds for those older style pieces, and that they don't want to go to the trouble or expense of recreating them. This still doesn't explain why we can by cypress tress in bulk, but (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New legend is up —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | If I knew any better, I'd think that LEGO direct was trying to sway the vote from these two hallmark sets. You look at the rarity of these sets these days...and the costs of these sets on on-line marketplaces....well, that's my opinion anyways. I (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New legend is up —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) The Legends vote started before the cypress tree was re-released. Obviously (to my mind) they didn't know they would/could provide the trees when they wrote the description for Main Street. James (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New legend is up —John Herre
|
| | | | (...) There was some discussion about not including cypress trees when the Legends vote started in April of 2002. The cypress trees had already been announced in November 2001. John (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New legend is up —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | | (...) Cypress Trees are not in the current S@H catalog (granted, it omits many products, but other trees are there). 10113 does not seem to be available on shop.lego.com anymore. I would tend to suspect that they got their last use of the mold when (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
