To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 36510
36509  |  36511
Subject: 
Re: Greed?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general
Date: 
Tue, 16 Apr 2002 04:55:46 GMT
Viewed: 
60 times
  
In lugnet.lego.direct, Richard Noeckel writes:
~Perhaps your word usage is flawed?

Larry Pieniazek writes:
Yes, perhaps it is. Ben is E2L

Thanks for elaborating on that!
I too knew that English was his 2nd Language and therefore
I endeavored to point out that the discrepancy may exist in translation.

Ben is E2L(1), (E)nglish as a (2)nd (L)anguage...
please keep that in mind, and sometimes that causes misunderstanding.

I tried too…
I hope I didn’t come across as impolite.
I like Ben and respect what he has to say, that’s why I wanted to clarify.

I'm in the camp that's glad any time Lego, in
any shape or form, (re)releases a good set,

Ah, ‘tis a fine camp to be in!
(Any good Lego is great Lego)

2 - More MOC sets please, and hurry!!!!
And that's all I am going to say about that.

WoW, Yah…
What’s up wit da?
I'd almost forgot!
Is the MOC line more infrequent than the Legends?
Are we only to expect 2 a year?


         Till then,

                      --==RïçhårÐ==--



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Greed?
 
(...) and thanks for that. Sorry if I used your post as a periodic reminder to folks that not everyone is E1L and to keep it in mind.... (...) Roger that! Got any marshmallows for the campfire? (...) :-) (23 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
  Re: Greed?
 
(...) My guess is that LD was waiting to see how well the first one did before committing to doing any more. I'm sure there is a large lead-time for new sets like this, and since it was kept secret until its release, we have no way of knowing how (...) (23 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Greed?
 
(...) Yes, perhaps it is. Ben is E2L(1), please keep that in mind, and sometimes that causes misunderstanding. Reading over your words and his, I don't find that much disagreement, believe it or not. (I'm in the camp that's glad any time Lego, in (...) (23 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

89 Messages in This Thread:
















































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR