Subject:
|
Re: Webcam Pictures?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 01:51:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2596 times
|
| |
|
|
Well, I do have a little I can add.. those pictures are probably the best I've
EVER seen a webcam do. If you really want to get a webcam I'd look into getting
the one he used for those pics, otherwise I'd save your money and wait for
something better.
I had a webcam... for 2 days and returned it, it just wasn't that great...
just my 2 shutter clicks ;)
Tamy
John Henry Kruer wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Kyle Beatty writes:
> > In lugnet.general, John Henry Kruer writes:
> > > Could somebody post some pictures of a Lego model using a webcam? (or any
> > > other digital phototography thingie in the webcam price range)
> > > Just want to know how bad the quality is.
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > John Kruer
> >
> > Pics taken with an Intel Pocket PC cam while doing its webcam thing:
> >
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=15108
> >
> > The webcam page:
> >
> > http://appleogue.net
>
> Thanks. Hmmmm... Maybe webcams arn't that bad... Anybody have nay
> opinions on how 'refurbished' webcams might work?
>
> John Kruer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Webcam Pictures?
|
| (...) As was mentioned in a previous thread a while ago, this camera is pretty good for its class, has NOTHING in the way of actual features that you would expect in a real camera, lighting is everything, and with rebates costs $70. Thanks for the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
