Subject:
|
Re: Reinventing the minifig
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Apr 1999 04:13:29 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jmkopp@projsolutions.comSTOPSPAM
|
Viewed:
|
977 times
|
| |
|
|
i would like to propose a tecnic version of the MF. in the 8480
style..no 'skin' to the air(space) craft. now that would be a supurb
set!
--justin
Tom McDonald wrote:
>
> In lugnet.dear-lego, Sanjay D'Souza writes:
> > Thomas Main wrote in message <37028270.8968AE2E@appstate.edu>...
> >
> > > Various people have lamented that Lego cars can't seat two
> > > figs side-by-side, even six stud wide trains are not realistic to figs,
> > > etc. People have also stated that minifigs aren't realistically
> > > porportioned.
> >
> > I think people are losing sight of the fact that LEGO is directed at "kids"
> > who generally speaking wouldn't care if the sets are realistically
> > proportioned or not.
> >
> > In any case part of the joy of LEGO is working within its limitations.
>
> Right. It may sound like I'm losing sight but I'm not. I'm just dreaming :) I
> suspect a Model Team version Falcon is more likely.
>
> -Tom McD.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
