To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 35048
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) Who is we? <snip> Jude (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) Me and my kid brain. I write the 'Letters to LEGO', he writes the reviews. :) On a more serious note, the 'we' is the collection of alternative voices that are being given a new venue. Regards, Allan B. - The Expert Builder website - (URL) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) Jude (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) Isn't that what LUGNET is for? :) In all honesty.... I don't know. I'd have to read the letter and see. But frankly, of the two letters already posted, there are points with which I do not agree. However, the overall tone *is* in keeping with (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) not reflect your apparent theme of 'Classic LEGO good, Current LEGO bad'? Jude (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) I'm saying I can't speak until I read the letter. After all that's gone on in this thread tonight, this is as honest as I can be with you. I've also clearly and publically stated that the site is an autocracy, not a democracy. It's rule by (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) I do not see your opinions being expressed as souring LUGNET. Now if you carry them into a flamewar then then I could see it. Although I do find it strange that you want to advertise the alternate opinions that you want to take away from (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) I don't see this thread as a flamewar... at least I hope it's not becoming that. I'm trying to respond to everyone's concerns over this 'column' incident by reminding people that they are already participating in a site that generally embraces (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
In lugnet.general, Allan Bedford writes: [snip] (...) Worse in what way? The criticism isn't of your comments on the columns isn't that you said (paraphrasing) "the column is bad", it's that you said (again paraphrasing) "the column could be (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) That will be the "royal we" : "monarch's use of the first person plural when referring to him/herself." Scott A BTW : I think he means himself and the reader... you must have seen that form of writing before? (22 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) Oh, is that what he was doing? Hmph. Well.... We are not amused. BTW this is for Allan: :-) Maggie C. (22 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR