Subject:
|
Re: Is this bad design?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:25:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
418 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I've found the following interesting LEGO behaviour while working on the deck
> for my bridge. It consists of (many) plates held together on the bottom by
> technic beams. There's a picture of the construction here
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/RoscoHead/coathanger/big3.jpg. As you can
> see, there's also small plates holding the technic bricks together. The result
> I'm getting is shown here
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/RoscoHead/coathanger/big1.jpg and here
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/RoscoHead/coathanger/big2.jpg. In just over a
> metre, the middle of the deck is raised about 1cm. In the context of the
> bridge, this is actually a bonus, however I see it as generally a "bad thing".
>
> And further to that problem, The side decks (which are only 4 studs wide) are
> exhibiting a horizontal version of the problem, see the pics at
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/RoscoHead/coathanger/small1.jpg and
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/RoscoHead/coathanger/small2.jpg. You can see,
> with the row of 1x6 plates next to the row of bricks, there is considerable
> horizontal curvature, in addition to the vertical curvature! And this is
> definitely bad for my bridge deck!
>
> Has anyone else experienced this?
>
> ROSCO
Rosco,
I haven't personally, but I know Eric Harshbarger ran into stuff like this
building his Lego desk, http://www.ericharshbarger.org/lego/desk.html . He
mentioned how building in one direction caused a warp by the way he put down
the bricks.
Thanks,
George
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Is this bad design?
|
| Hi all, I've found the following interesting LEGO behaviour while working on the deck for my bridge. It consists of (many) plates held together on the bottom by technic beams. There's a picture of the construction here (URL) As you can see, there's (...) (23 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
7 Messages in This Thread: ![Is this bad design? -Ross Crawford (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Is this bad design? -Adrian Drake (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![RE: Is this bad design? -Bram Lambrecht (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Is this bad design? -Ed Jones (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.pun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Is this bad design? -Jason S. Mantor (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Is this bad design? -Ross Crawford (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|