 | | Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet —Allan Bedford
|
| | | (...) I think the main reason that some of it is so negative (and I'm guilty of that) is that some of the products are plain and simple crap. I've made this analogy before, but I'll make it again. Not telling the LEGO company how bad some of their (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (XPOST & FUT off-topic.debate) (...) This is a tangent, and I'm not commenting on your analogy. But... 'The bottle of beer in his hand' is *not* the alcoholic's real problem. It's *a* problem, and it certainly needs to be dealt with. But throwing (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | | | (...) All right..... I'll give you that one. :) I wasn't really thinking the analogy through completely. Regards, Allan (I'm not a LEGOaholic, I just play one on the internet) (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | ta ta Jack Stone? (Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Is there any basis for this, or is it just speculation? (...) The current series actually makes quite a good toy. I think the play value is quite high. I'm just sorry that we largely have Jack Stone at the expense of town. Ultimately, Jack (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: ta ta Jack Stone? (Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet) —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) I think this was just wishful thinking. :) I know that this is all I want for Christmas. (...) It might make a good toy, but I think it makes a poor LEGO series. Just my opinion; not based on any facts. (...) I think this is the biggest (...) (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: ta ta Jack Stone? (Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I agree. The parts are mostly poor and a little oversized, but it is a great introduction to Lego. I just wish my youngest kid is a little older... although Duplo is plenty fun too! (...) You mean Jack Stone II? :o Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
