| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) To a certain extent this is true, but this is true of all public forums. This can be seen in every Internet newsgroup that I participate in. In my opinion, Lugnet has as its creators and keepers some of the most vocal and popular of the core (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
Good point, Jeff. I, too, will always be a part of the Lego community regardless of my "popularity." (OOOH! A response! I feel so important now!) OK, I'll shut up. (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) Heh. I like that shuttle, by the way; I remember posting something to that effect around Christmastime, but the gallery says it's new. Was there a prior incar- nation, or are they just new photos? LFB (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
Thanks, LFB. They're new photos of the same model with minor detail improvements, to be precise. I wanted to clean up the background as well, so I placed the shuttle on the back of a road sign for the metallic reflective effect. It's the back of an (...) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
| | Updated Shuttle MOC (thread dragged over from .general)
|
|
(...) I'll have to go look at it again to check out those effects, as they didn't compute before. What details changed? If possible, you might consider putting up one of the old photos, just to highlight those changes--my memory isn't what it used (...) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
| | Re: Updated Shuttle MOC (thread dragged over from .general)
|
|
If I were to re-post older (blurry) pics of the shuttle, the only noticeable difference would be the lack of landing gear. The shuttle used to sit on a stack of six CDs, so I decided some feet would do it justice. They are true to the actual model - (...) (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.people)
|