Subject:
|
Re: 'Stubbies' © Richard (and he can have 'em if he wants 'em!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.fun, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:01:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
82 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.fun, Richard Noeckel writes:
> P.S. Why are these posts being directed to .fun???
'Cause I was just funnin' with you, perhaps? [1]
8?P
Matt
[1] Say, thse footnotes are kinda' fun too!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: 'Stubbies' © Compromise
|
| (...) Well duh, I knew that
. <scrambles to retrieve killer monkeys> (...) What does that mean
perhaps? I think it means that deep down we both want some kind recognition for this ground-breaking revelation. It was fine before, you can have the (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 'Stubbies' © Richard & (maybe) Matthew
|
| <cough thief cough> O.K. fine, you can have the term Stubbies © But the term Stubby is MINE! [TM, ©, ® etc.] You can receive the royalties for the plural, and I'll accept the profits for the singular term
sounds fair? I wont forget this, you (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.general)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|