 | | Re: Lego in Fastcompany magazine
|
|
"Jason King" <jklugnet665@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:GI7rs6.2Ly@lugnet.com... (...) Yes. But returing to profitability might turn it into a different Lego company. There seemed to be an underlying message that Lego needed to change as (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in Fastcompany magazine
|
|
Lawrence Wilkes wrote in message ... (...) collectors), but who knows if they will be (...) AFOL who value bulk bricks etc? Not any of the (...) The kids I worked with at my daughter's school in the last few years were classic Lego maniacs - build (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in Fastcompany magazine
|
|
Kevin Wilson <kwilson_tccs@compuserve.com> wrote in message news:GI81oG.63B@lugnet.com... (...) set (...) and (...) very (...) overheard (...) Lego (...) and (...) This is very interesting and a bit Sad...Perhaps LEGO is going about it all wrong, (...) (23 years ago, 18-Aug-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in Fastcompany magazine
|
|
Lawrence & All, (...) Indeed. (...) company. (...) much now as > it did from when it moved from wooden toys to plastic bricks. I think LEGO will need to change, I think some of the reasons of their losses have come from the result of either changing (...) (23 years ago, 19-Aug-01, to lugnet.general)
|
