 | | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
|
| Dave & All, (...) Now, now, we all love each other here, right? ; ) (...) This whole situation was very unique, and I think we need to look at it in that regard. I might have bought the set for the child, I might not have. It depends on a lot of (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
|
| Scott E. Sanburn wrote in message ... (...) not (...) space, (...) I don't think falling in love with a series/theme is necessary for AFOL-ism... when I was a Lego-loving kid I had *no* themed sets because the very first (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
|
| Kevin & All, (...) To that extent, true, the over 40 crowd (Which is cool in it's own way). But I guess i was referring to the 20~20 year olds mostly, who grew up with the themed sets, specifically trhe minifig sets, that built that strong (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
|
| "Scott E. Sanburn" <ssanburn@indalex.com> wrote in message news:GG6Mt4.E8z@lugnet.com... (...) not (...) space, (...) next (...) Well, I think I'm an AFOL. I'm 39 and my collection is reaching 200K pieces, (fairly small, from an US point of view, (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
|
| Carlo & All, (...) Folks, just a disclaimer here, seems to be misinterpreted a lot here, I am just saying "many of us would be here" blah blah blah. That does mean that it is not 100%, but from what I have seen, and the people I have talked too, (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
| |
