 | | Re: I'm back... —Scott Chambers
|
| | | (...) Did you also spoof Todd's name earlier tonight? I saw this post: (URL) is now canceled) But I did see it when it was up, and the top part where you say (I am using this nyme...) was there, just as you put it on another post. It stuck out to me (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Jaco van der Molen
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: I'm back... —Scott Chambers
|
| | | | | | <snip> (...) Ah, I see. This is a good example that Todd needs to put *some* security on this site. (...) And I understand this, but do you think you are going about it in the correct way? I read your site, and I can agree with you on **some** of (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | (canceled) —Jaco van der Molen
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: I'm back... —Scott Chambers
|
| | | | | | | | (...) For what? Just curious - and how do you know? <snip> (...) I do not think its that deep, I was more curious if *you* personally thought you were going about it in the correct way. I take it you do, because you see it as a good way to get (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Jaco van der Molen
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm back... —Scott Chambers
|
| | | | | | | | | | <snip> (...) Really? Then would it be safe to assume that you and Todd are "ok" with each other? And if this is so, then why did he ban you? (...) <snip> (...) True, but has it worked? What was your driving force to post here that has changed? The (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Jaco van der Molen
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Scott Chambers
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Scott Chambers
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: I'm back... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) This guy has been banned for repeated violations of the ToS. That is not "no particular reason", no matter what he says. Read anything he says with care and a skeptical eye. Better yet, ignore him. ++Lar (24 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Scott Chambers
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | (canceled) —Scott Chambers
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Scott Chambers
|
| | | | |
