General Discussion : 28544


General / 28544	28543 \| 28545

Subject:	Re: The Toy Book's report on LEGO 2001 (U.S.)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.general
Date:	Tue, 6 Mar 2001 13:02:44 GMT
Viewed:	89 times

> > sigh. Yet another poor research job by TLC. Slizers (sleezers) is still • one of > my favorites). Which reminds me: To the Dutch, the name 'Znap' actually sounds like 'is fake'. Pretty well chosen name for a toy which soley existed to beat Knex (and failed). Eric

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: The Toy Book's report on LEGO 2001 (U.S.)
(...) Heh, someone should start a webpage that chronicles all the bad names (and why they're bad). Just so we don't lose track. :) --Todd (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: The Toy Book's report on LEGO 2001 (U.S.)
(...) That's what I was referring to in my exclamation: "Are they serious? ...Zooters?!" and "I don't know if I even believe this..." I didn't want to come right out and say it. I'm no history expert. But I figured some people would know what I was (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.general)

8 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search