 | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —John Warren
|
| | | (...) Here, here! Get that overpriced junk off the shelves and give us some good sets with lots of pieces like in the late 80's. Even my little nephew agrees with this philosophy. John Warren (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | (...) Assuming TLC wants to cover all targets in the young, what would you like to see in between DUPLO and those late 80's sets? Like if a boy wants his Mom to buy the Silver Champion for him, but he's 3. Kind of an exageration there, but while I'm (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | | (...) Didn't LEGO address this in the 1980s? That is, I recall that at least one or two of the US medium catalogs from c.1985 [1] pitched "Basic" sets as a series of graduated steps: there were sets with the "finger puppets" and mostly blocks that (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | (...) I see your point but I have read that line over a few times, and it makes me laugh...."little Billie" wants something his older brother "Jeffy" has.... I guess that's the jealousy factor.... (...) Mmmmm...I think you are right about this...I (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | In lugnet.general, Benjamin Medinets writes: ... (...) ... Wow, that's cool to hear someone mention those LEGO Basic sets. I miss those. The 3 you mention were the age 7+ sets in green boxes. see (URL) were also 5+ (blue) see (URL) 3+ (orange). see (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
