Subject:
|
Re: Clarification, and another point
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 00:51:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
990 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford writes:
> In lugnet.general, David Simmons writes:
> >
> > Besides, IMHO, TLG solved this problem in a much better way in the older
> > instruction booklets. They simply placed a white border around the pieces
> > that had been added in that step. Or they would put the piece in a window
> > with an arrow pointing to where it should go. I think both James Simpson
> > and Mark Nelson Jr. mentioned this in their posts. Both methods are
> > graphic, non-verbal cues that are very easy to interpret. Why change this?
> > It worked great for years.
>
> They still use this technique in big technic sets
AND Model Team... the latter uses both the individual parts illustrations
and spotter bricks where needed, as well as subassembly drawings.
> (not that there's many new
> ones of those) like the 8448. It helps a lot in these models.
>
> ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
81 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
