Subject:
|
Re: TLG and "Seeding"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 19:57:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1566 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, James Simpson writes:
<snipped well taken points>
> On Lugnet it
> sometimes seems that one risks being branded an insensitive blow-hard for mere
> criticism of the company.
Or for sticking up for it when it's unfairly maligned, for that matter.
OK, here's a question to the audience, then... which group is a good one for
discussing the theory of instruction creation?
possible fits include general, build, publish, and some CAD group or another
but probably not all of them at once. :-) I really *do* have a bit of a
problem, as I related before, that I think would be interesting to thrash
out in the proper group.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: TLG and "Seeding"
|
| (...) I for one have no problem getting spotter parts if they are tactfully concealed within the model and don't detract from the design. No bashing from these quarter. That said, Jake voiced opinions (that were not limited to spotting) which I (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.general)
|
81 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
