Subject:
|
Re: Medical experiments on minifigs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:21:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
386 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Lester Witter writes:
> I was watching a show on the "Ten most important machines" (approximate title)
> on the Discover Channel (Learning Channel?). One of the machines was remote
> surgery. The doctor was demonstrating fine remote manipulation and the test
> subect was a minifig!!!. I want to see a consent form. Should we form an
> advocacy group to defend minifigs from exploitation (PETM perhaps?). What do
> you think?
> PS: Would it make any difference if the minifig was a timmy?
See this thread:
http://news.lugnet.com/market/buy-sell-trade/?n=6562&t=f&v=a
Maggie C.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Medical experiments on minifigs
|
| Maggie Cambron <mcambron@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:G90LK4.2vs@lugnet.com... (...) the Timmy phenomenon! This explains a lot! Now to just find out about Jar-Jar... ROSCO (23 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Medical experiments on minifigs
|
| (...) Sad thing is, is was NOT a Timmy, it was a 'Tron if I believe a M-Tron one, white torso with red/reddish prints? (those fig came out during my "Dark Ages' and I am too tired to track the specifics on it, saw part of the show, saw the good (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Medical experiments on minifigs
|
| I was watching a show on the "Ten most important machines" (approximate title) on the Discover Channel (Learning Channel?). One of the machines was remote surgery. The doctor was demonstrating fine remote manipulation and the test subect was a (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.general)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
