Subject:
|
Medical experiments on minifigs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:05:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
351 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
I was watching a show on the "Ten most important machines" (approximate title)
on the Discover Channel (Learning Channel?). One of the machines was remote
surgery. The doctor was demonstrating fine remote manipulation and the test
subect was a minifig!!!. I want to see a consent form. Should we form an
advocacy group to defend minifigs from exploitation (PETM perhaps?). What do
you think?
Lester
PS: Would it make any difference if the minifig was a timmy?
PPS: Is this the correct group
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
4 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Medical experiments on minifigs -Maggie Cambron (19-Feb-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Medical experiments on minifigs -Ross Crawford (19-Feb-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Medical experiments on minifigs -Mike Timm (20-Feb-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|