| | Re: LARGEST LEGO LOT ON EBAY EVER!! (???) Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | Ack! That is indeed a whole friggin' mess of LEGO! (...) I think that unless he breaks it up, nobody's going to fork over the amount he's hoping for. It requires too much free cash in one place--maybe before the dot-com crash someone might have (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: LARGEST LEGO LOT ON EBAY EVER!! (???) Ray Sanders
|
| | | | (...) Possibly, possibly not. I did some quick calculations. A month or so back, I posted the results of my 'how many 2x4 bricks are in a pound' experiment. My answer was 202-203 (or 101/8-oz to be precise). 2x4 bricks are, at least to me, a (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LARGEST LEGO LOT ON EBAY EVER!! (???) Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) I don't know--your mass/pieces reckoning is fine by me, but you're far undervaluing the market value of the pieces, IMHO. $0.10 is a good rule of thumb buying them at MSRP; even then, we'd be talking $47,500. But my experience of selling parts (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LARGEST LEGO LOT ON EBAY EVER!! (???) Ray Sanders
|
| | | | (...) The auction listing mentions that he may be willing to take the hi-bid if the reserve is not met. <trying to remember the rules of ebay proxy biddy> Does the proxy bidding of your high-bid only apply *after* you pass the reserve ? In other (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LARGEST LEGO LOT ON EBAY EVER!! (???) Mark Hollingsworth
|
| | | | (...) It doesn't quite work that way. Proxy bidding works the same way even before the reserve is met. (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |