Subject:
|
Re: TLG investigation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Feb 1999 02:37:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1523 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, toms@netscape.com (Tom Stangl) writes:
> Well, was that 100 minimum of EACH piece, or 100pc minimum for the TOTAL
> ORDER?
My understanding (from someone in RTL long ago) was that it was 100 minimum of
each type of piece ordered. You couldn't get 10 of one thing and 20 of another
and 5 of another and have it add up to 100. This makes sense, too, because of
the labor involved.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: TLG investigation
|
| I am not sure if anybody has made this comment regarding bulk prices yet so here goes. In order to make this worthwhile I think you have to look at the auto part industry example. Car X retails for $Y. The part price for all parts in Car X would (...) (25 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: TLG investigation
|
| (...) Well, was that 100 minimum of EACH piece, or 100pc minimum for the TOTAL ORDER? -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | | Please do not associate my personal views with my employer | (25 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
